Action Alert for CA! Call, then Show Up to Committee April 8 Hearing on Senate Bill 286 That Prohibits Early Release

Source: ACSOL

The CA Senate Public Safety Committee is scheduled to conduct a hearing April 8 regarding two bad bills the same day:

If passed, Senate Bill 286 would prohibit individuals convicted of several offenses from release from early release from custody due to their age.  In order to be considered for release, an individual must have served at least 20 years in custody and be at least 50 years old.

“Senate Bill 286 will prevent the release of many registrants who are rehabilitated and deemed suitable for reentry,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “That is why ACSOL is opposed to this bill.”  

Although this bill is expected to apply to only a small number of people, it is important to stop it because if passed it would be yet another example of a law that creates an exception for individuals convicted of a sex offense. An existing example is that individuals convicted of stealing something worth less than $950 is a misdemeanor for most people. However, if a person is required to register stealing something of that value is a felony.

The bill was introduced by Senator Brian Jones, a Republican from San Diego county, and co-authored by Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen, a Democrat, from Sacramento county.  If this bill is approved by the Senate Public Safety Committee, it will be considered on the floor of the Senate.

There is no time to write, so please make calls and show up:

(1) MAKE CALLS:
 
Due to the short time between now and the date of the Senate hearing, a more effective way to communicate opposition to Senate Bill 286 is through phone calls to six members of the Senate Public Safety Committee, just like you did for Senate bill 680.
 
Call starting on Tuesday, April 1 (after the March 31 holiday). When you call, say you want to comment on a bill. The staff member just wants to know your name and city/ZIP and that you oppose Senate Bill 286 (and also 680, if you haven’t called about it yet) : 
 
Jesse Arreguin, Chairman, (916) 651-4007
Kelly Seyarto, Vice Chairman, (916) 651-4032
Anna Caballero, (916) 651-4014
Lena Gonzalez, (916) 651-4033
Sasha Perez, (916) 651-4025
Scott Weiner, (916) 651-4011
 
(2) SHOW UP:
 
Here is your chance to oppose not just one but two bad bills on the same day: Senate Bills 286 and 680
 
The hearings for both bills will be held Tuesday, April 8, some time after 9:30 a.m. in:
The legislative office building
1021 O Street
Room 2200.
Sacramento
 
ACSOL staff will be there to explain what to do. It’s easy! We just say our name, city, and that we oppose these bills. That really does make a difference! Nobody used to oppose these bad bills, and we helped to stop them!
 

Download ACSOL’s letter opposing SB 286 so you can see why:

SB 286 - OPPOSE - March 2025 03312025

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Although this bill is expected to apply to only a small number of people, it is important to stop it because if passed it would be yet another example of a law that creates an exception for individuals convicted of a sex offense. An existing example is that individuals convicted of stealing something worth less than $950 is a misdemeanor for most people. However, if a person is required to register stealing something of that value is a felony.

Finished all calls except Sasha Perez, (916) 651-4025. It says call can not be completed? Can we confirm that the phone number is correct?

Last edited 6 days ago by someone who cares

I will be making calls, wrote my letter and sent it last night. And I will be there next Tuesday to stand up and speak out against this bill and SB 680. Anyone care to join me?

if passed this means people won’t be able to get off parole until they are 50 years old or get off from the registry? I’m confused.

Janice is right, I know a guy who got into a domestic dispute with his wife, She was leaving him and said she needed some space . So respectfully for the kids sake he did the right thing and left, One day he stop by before work to grab something and he saw a guy leaving his house, After everyone was gone he went in the house and broke a bunch of stuff and destroyed a $3000 mattresses he bought and left.
She ended up calling the cops on him and they arrested him at work. In court the DA brought up his 1999 290 felony conviction he also had a 2010 FTR conviction which he served three years probation on BUT the actual crime he was in court for was a wobbler meaning it could be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor the DA charged him with a felony and riverside county struck him out under the California 3 strike law.

Please note that you can also email the senators. I have included the link below and plan to spread the word to others.
Senators | California State Senate

I called the offices this morning and as stated by others, it took less than 10 minutes. Some of the offices asked for my name and/or zip code. One office asked for neither. Please continue to make calls especially next Monday, April 7, the day before the hearing. The senators need to know that we care about these bills and oppose them!

I made phone calls and wrote letters. Additionally, I communicated with a couple of incarcerated friends who will be negatively impacted if SB 286 is passed. They connected family members to the ACSOL website who then made calls on behalf of the incarcerated individuals. One is currently entering the 2nd parole hearing which will take later this year. I don’t believe the senators fully comprehend that a person doesn’t automatically receive an age-related early release after 20 years of prison. It almost always requires multiple parole hearings, and the vetting process is detailed. The two people that I know are being required to read books and take courses prior to be considered. This requirement is similar in nature to these “treatment programs” that a person on parole/probation faces.